<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why wait</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigslist.org/?p=36#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Nice!  Recently, my girlfriend and I moved into a new house and have been engaging in lots of little transactions here in Austin with our fellow townsfolk using CL and it's worked out really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!  Recently, my girlfriend and I moved into a new house and have been engaging in lots of little transactions here in Austin with our fellow townsfolk using CL and it&#8217;s worked out really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.R.</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>P.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigslist.org/?p=36#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>Congrats on beating the other big sites on yet another metric.
Unfortunately, the content that "lean and mean" CL is speedily delivering is now mostly spam.

The users (this one, and many others in FeFo) ask you for help in reducing spam.
Manual flagging cannot possibly counter the avalanche of automated spambot posts.

The least CL can do is open a discussion on reducing spam.
This might provide some fresh ideas and lead to a consensus on what measures to take.

Thanks for listening.

P.R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on beating the other big sites on yet another metric.<br />
Unfortunately, the content that &#8220;lean and mean&#8221; CL is speedily delivering is now mostly spam.</p>
<p>The users (this one, and many others in FeFo) ask you for help in reducing spam.<br />
Manual flagging cannot possibly counter the avalanche of automated spambot posts.</p>
<p>The least CL can do is open a discussion on reducing spam.<br />
This might provide some fresh ideas and lead to a consensus on what measures to take.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening.</p>
<p>P.R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlackerDan</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>SlackerDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigslist.org/?p=36#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>0.6 seconds? I can't wait that long!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.6 seconds? I can&#8217;t wait that long!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/why-wait/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigslist.org/?p=36#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>eBay Avg Load Time: 1.235 Seconds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eBay Avg Load Time: 1.235 Seconds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
